Hey there people , my dear friend Pat Boyd is coming off a major surgery. He had a totally blocked main artery
in his neck ..They went in last week and had it cleaned out …He had some complications, and was back in the hospital ,but is home now .This man is one of the badest men on the planet ,he was not only one of the best detectives the pd ever had .He is also one of the best men ,father ,and husband there is on this earth….He is
also an amazing friend …… So im asking for prayers ,and messages to wish him well…No phone calls please …
but texts and posts and any well wishes are needed to help lift his spirits …..Help me show him how much he
is loved and admired .He is a proud strong man , No doubt he will recover, and we will be playing golf again
before his doctors allow him to….I dont ask for favors much ,but this old fker means alot to me ,his family and
his San Jose pd family…. Thanks .
urphys, CA Mon=108 Tue 107
HOW MANY TIMES DO WE SEE THIS PICTURE?
WHY NOT A FLEET OF 5? HOW MUCH MORE EFFICIENT!!
WHERE DO I GET A PATENT? QUICK!!
SAN JOSE, CA – JUNE 5: Police form a line across East Santa Clara at Fourth Streets in San Jose, Calif., on Friday, June 6, 2020. Police cleared the area after an unlawful assembly was declared. (Anda Chu/Bay Area News Group)
OUR GUYS AT WORK!
San Jose quietly teams up with billionaire developer
on new $43 million-plus police training complex
|Police facility would include a basketball court, indoor shooting range and a training field
$ 43 MILLION-PLUS POLICE COMPLEX
By Maggie Angst
Though some residents are calling on San Jose to cut its Police Department, city officials have been quietly negotiating with Silicon Valley real estate billionaire John Arrillaga for the potential development of an estimated $ 43 million-plus police training and academy complex, recently submitted planning
The proposed plans, submitted on behalf of Arrillaga after closed- door discussions he had with city officials, show that the facility would be situated on a vacant site Arrillaga owns on Hellyer Avenue in South San Jose, about a block from Highway 101, according to county property records. The proposal is currently under review by the city Planning Department but has not been endorsed by the city.
“ This is not a plan that city staff has indicated a willingness to move forward on and nor has the council,” Mayor Sam Liccardo said in an interview Friday. “ We need to learn more about it, and all would have to be done in public session before we can spend a dime.”
The developer’s preliminary plans include a 100,000-squarefoot building with a training area for current officers on one side, academy rooms for incoming officers on another side and a basketball court in the middle. Behind the main building, the complex would feature an outdoor training field, a deck and an accessory indoor shooting range.
T he cit y ha s earmarked $ 43 million for a police training facility from Measure T — a $650 million infrastructure bond measure passed by voters in November 2
018. San Jose Public Works Director Matt Cano said his department has been in “ preliminary conversations” with the property owner for several months on a potential partnership that would give San Jose the land as a donated gift.
“ If we were to buy a property and build it from scratch for ourselves, our budget would not be sufficient,” he said. “ In order to get what we really want, we could buy an existing building and rent a Complex
ovate it or we could partner with someone, which is what you’re seeing with this submittal.” The planning documents match county property records that show the site’s owners are Arrillaga and his business partner Richard Peery. The property, which the pair bought in “There’s been a lot of discussion about this because of
frustration from residents about poor 911 response times,” Liccardo said. ” And this (proposal) is something that is directly responsive to the longstanding desire of voters who overwhelmingly supported Measure T.” A dedicated police training and academy facility such as the one proposed would be the first of its kind for San Jose.
2012, is assessed at $158,000 – likely a small fraction of the current market price based on the cost of recently purchased nearby parcels. Arrillaga and Peery could not be reached for comment.
Arrillaga’s preliminary plans for the new police training facility come before the city amid a local and national call to divert law enforcement funding to social and community services in the wake of the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd in May. City leaders decided two months ago to maintain the police force’s $449 million budget but also create a new Office of Racial Equity.
The Rev. Ray Montgomery, executive director of the social justice nonprofit People Acting in Community Together, said the proposal’s timing is “detrimental to building trust with the community.” “It’s simply irresponsible and inappropriate given the deficits this city is currently facing and the unresolved components
of what people are asking for,” Montgomery said. “We’re throwing good money at a broken system, and the city has once again proven they’re not interested in hearing from or listening to the people.” Raj Jayadev of Silicon Valley De-Bug said the proposal is akin to “intentionally twisting the knife after it’s been in our back” and building a “temple of white supremacy.”
“This is not just happen- ing in the middle of a revolutionary moment; it’s happening in the middle of a lethal pandemic and a broken economy,” Jayadev said. “People are hurting and quite literally dying, and this is just arrogance – dangerous arrogance.
“There will be a stop to this, and the city should know that. Our effort will be even more emboldened,” he added.
Upon Measure T passing in 2018, the city specified that $300 million would go toward fixing streets and the remaining $350 million would pay for improving police and fire stations and bolstering flood protections to prevent a disaster like the 2017 Coyote Creek flood from happening again.
The measure restricted San Jose to using the money for “acquisition, construction and completion of certain municipal improvements” and a spending plan passed by the council before the election stated that some of the funding would be used to build a new police training center. Legally, however, the city could decide
to put the $43 million toward other municipal capital improvement projects without voter approval.
To that end, Liccardo said the city has been open about the desire for a facility like the one proposed by The city currently runs its academy and training operations out of a 107,000-squarefoot police substation in South San Jose at Great Oaks Boulevard and Brooklyn Avenue. The $82 million substation, which opened just a few years ago, was built with funding from another public safety bond measure
approved by voters in 2002.
The initial vision for the facility was for it to become a second police headquarters where nearly 30% of the police force would work and provide critical backup for nearby emergencies. The goal was for it to reduce the time officers spent traveling to and from the police headquarters just north of downtown San Jose to their beat assignments.
But because of staffing shortfalls spurred by the late2000s economic recession and ensuing labor strife over police pension cuts, the substation has never truly served its intended use – an issue Cano says the new training facility would remedy.
“There are two reasons for building a new facility: In addition to the city needing to open that (the substation) for its intended use, we need to get something adequate to provide training and academy needs,” Cano said. San Jose Police Chief Eddie Gracia could not be reached for comment. The city’s real estate department also explored constructing the facility on publicly owned land but could not identify any available site large enough, according to Cano. Unlike most major capital projects funded by taxpayer dollars, the city has not yet put out requests for proposals to ensure a competitive bid process for the training facility.
“We’re looking very, very preliminarily at this partnership,” Cano said. “The purpose of this submittal is just for the private property owner to get an understanding of what’s feasible or not.” Staff writers George Avalos and Leo Castañeda contributed to this report. Arrillaga for nearly two years.
Copyright (c)2020 The Mercury News, Edition. Please review new arbitration language here. 8/15
High-capacity magazines ban blocked
The 2016 legislation ‘strikes at the core of the Second Amendment,’ judge writes
CALIFORNIA GUN LAWS
By Fiona Kelliher
A panel of the 9th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals ended California’s 2016 ban on possessing highcapacity ammunition magazines Friday in a decision that quickly spawned cheers and condemnation on opposite sides of the gun control debate.
In a majority opinion released Friday, Appellate Judge Kenneth Lee wrote that the state’s near- categorical ban of magazines with more than 10 bullets violates the constitutional right to bear arms to the extent that it “strikes at the core of the Second Amendment.” “ California’s law imposes a substantial burden on this
right to self- defense,” wrote Lee, who was appointed by A semiautomatic rifle is displayed with a 25-shot magazine, left, and a 10-shot magazine, right, at a gun store in Elk Grove.
President Donald Trump. “Law-abiding citizens, regardless of their training and track record, must alter or turn over to the state any LCMs that they may have legally owned for years – or face up to a year in jail.”
Judge Consuelo M. Callahan, a George W. Bush appointee, joined Lee in the decision. Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn of Texas, a Bill Clinton appointee, dissented.
Starting in 2000, it became illegal to manufacture, import or sell large capacity magazines in California.
But in 2016, as cities across the U.S. reeled from mass shootings, the state Legislature made possessing large capacity magazines of more than 10 rounds illegal.
Californians strengthened the provisions of that law with jail time a few months later when they passed Proposition 63. magazine and it is perfectly feasible for a state to ban them, as they are useful for mass killers,” Lowy said. “The Second Amendment does not empower private citizens to arm themselves with weapons of war, or override the public’s right to live, or prevent the duly elected legislature from enacting laws that preserve public safety and restrict common tools for mass
killers.” Gov. Gavin Newsom, when asked about the decision during a news conference Friday, said he had not yet read the opinion itself but that “the overwhelming majority of Californians agreed” with Proposition 63.
“We’ve long advanced efforts to focus not just on guns, but also focus on keeping those dangerous components out of the hands of people who should otherwise not be afforded that fundamental privilege slash right,”Newsom said. “Large-capacity magazine clips, with respect, I think fall into that category.” Gun industry
lobbyists and the National Rifle Association, which pushed for the initial lawsuit that led to Friday’s High-capacity magazines ban blocked The 2016 legislation ‘strikes at the core of the Second Amendment,’ judge writes
San Diegobased U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who blocked Proposition 63.
Broadening that original 2000 law effectively rendered about half of available weapons illegal across the state, Lee said, even though such magazines are not unusual nationwide. And while he acknowledged the history of gun violence, Lee added that “even well intentioned laws must pass constitutional muster.” “Magazines enjoy Second Amendment protection for a simple reason: Without a magazine, many weapons would be useless, including ‘quintessential’ self defense weapons like the handgun,” Lee wrote. Dissenting Judge Lynn meanwhile said that the ban is not so wide-ranging as to restrict the possession of magazines in general, meaning it does not place a substantial burden on the Second Amendment. She added that six other district courts nationwide have upheld similar laws.
Prominent gun control organizations decried the decision en masse Friday. Jonathan Lowy, chief counsel and legal vice president of the nonprofit Brady United, said in a statement that the opinion showed a “wildly” incorrect interpretation of the Second Amendment.
“There is no constitutional right to a high capacity decision, touted the opinion as a victory and partially credited Lee’s connection to the White House. “The judge who authored the opinion in this case was appointed by President Trump,” said spokesperson Amy Hunter. “That means everyone who voted progun in 2016 played a role in this significant win.”
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra did not immediately say Friday if he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling by the three judges, or if he would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, or whether the state would seek a delay of the ruling to prevent an immediate buying spree. Sales are currently on hold based on a stay by the lower court and cannot immediately resume.
The Associated Press and staff writer Robert Salonga contributed to this report.
Who should police the police?
California struggles with civilian oversight of cops
San Jose: Highway 101 standoff and shutdown
ends with man’s surrender
BREAKING: San Jose teacher suspended after appearing
topless in online class
FerInstance: #5. CALIFORNIA – ROUGH AND READY
Critter Corner: What to know about having a pet bird
Dear Miss Behavin’: I really want to get a bird, specifically a budgie. I have done a little research but I’m not sure if I’m ready for a pet bird. What do budgies need to feel comfortable?
HALF MOON BAY DRIVE-IN FAMILY FUN
FDR and Al Capone’s Cadillac; Truth or Myth?
Al Capone’s fabled 1928 Cadillac on display in England.
After several years of getting emails from viewers who peruse these Capone pages I decided to be one of the first in taking a deeper look into the matter. Myalcaponemuseum takes pride in weeding out the facts from fiction and bring only the facts to truth seekers. I have seen the FDR/ Capone caddy reference popping up on many sites since 2011, some of them reputable sites (CNN, CBS, The New York Times, The Daily Mirror etc…). I’m glad to see other sites now jumping on the bandwagon to help stop the further perpetuation of this myth.
This myth dates back many years. I also found the reference in several trusted modern works such as David Brinkley’s “Washington goes to war”, Stanley Weintraub’s “Pearl Harbor Christmas”. Following suit these rumors were perpetuated in other books on or relating to FDR, World War 2, interesting facts, etc…..
It was also mentioned as fact on the History channel’s “The United Stuff of America” and “Lost History”. It was also mentioned on many car websites and other Capone related websites. All accept this as fact. After some research, here is what I found.
On November 20th, 1971, Al Capone’s alleged 1928 Cadillac was sold at auction for $37,000. It was at this moment that this 1928 Capone Cadillac was again mentioned as also being the one used by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This was probably done by the car owner or auction house who did faulty research and also perhaps in order to boost the sale of the car by having two historical figures tied to it. Researchers and authors from then on believed what they read and connected this Caddy’s sales history from newspaper stories along with Michael Reilly’s 1947 book embellishments. Sadly, this has now become accepted as historic fact.
1971 story mentioning FDR/Capone.
The FDR /Capone story was originally started by Michael F. Reilly, who was Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Secret Service man. In 1947, he was sharing his memoirs to Simon Schuster in order to have his story published for a 1947 book called “Reilly of The White House” and later in 1958 for “Treasury Agents”. Excerpts were published in newspapers around the country for both book releases to entice the readers in buying the book. Some budding authors pick up on this during research and perpetuate it in their works.
FDR Secret service agent Michael Reilly.
(Credit 1936 ACME photo)
Reilly mentions the dire need to protect the President after the attack on Pearl harbor and that the Government at that time could not spend anymore money on cars. They had supposedly impounded Capone’s armoured vehicle once he went to prison and decided to use it for the President’s protection after December 8, 1941. Many authors and news stories through time now have the Capone caddy enroute from the White House to FDR’S destination in front of Congress for his Day of Infamy speech. This was to give his famous Pearl Harbor speech declaring war on Japan on December 8, 1941.
Here is an exerpt from Michael Reilly’s “Reilly of the White House”.
“On the night of December 7 we sat around and tried to figure just what new steps must be taken for the protection of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Commander-in-Chief of a nation at war. We were little short on time, because he was to make his first public appearance within twelve hours when he rode from the White House to the Capitol to ask a joint session of Congress for a declaration of war against Japan.
The next morning we lined his route from the White House to the Capitol with soldiers, draped ourselves all over his car, and hoped for the best. We turned out every policeman in Washington, and we virtually soaked the halls of Congress with Secret Service operatives summoned from New York, Philadelphia, and other Eastern cities.
I had always thought the President of the United States should have an armored car. We worked on the theory that the vast majority of Americans, regardless of their political affiliations, were unofficial Secret Service men and would help us in any way they could. But our “nut” files told us with dreadful clarity that there were literally tens of thousands of Americans who would love to shoot the President of the United States and it mattered very little what the President’s name or party happened to be. Hence my lust for an armored vehicle, but armored cars cost money and the Government of the United States can spare only $750 for any single automobile. We could pay a million and a half dollars for a cannon if we thought that would protect the President, but the book said $750 for a car, and when the book says anything in the government that’s it. However, I made a phone call.
On December 9 the President sent for me and said, “Mike, I want to go for a ride, and don’t look so horrified. I’m not going to spend the rest of the war in hiding.”
I said, having no choice, ‘*Yes sir. What time will you be ready?”
We brought the car around for him, and he was on my arm as it rolled into the driveway. “What’s that thing, Mike?” he asked.
“Mr. President, I’ve taken the liberty of getting a new car. It’ s armored, I’m afraid it’s a little uncomfortable, and I know it has a dubious reputation.”
“Yes, sir. It belonged to Al Capone. The Treasury Department had a little trouble with Al, you know, and they got it from him in the subsequent legal complications. I got it from Treasury.”
The Boss looked at it a moment and said, “This is very interesting. I hope Mr. Capone doesn’t mind. How does it work?”
I explained it all, pointing out that any of Capone’s innumerable enemies could have gotten him easily if they remembered to shoot through the body of the car, rather than through the glass windshields, which were the only part of the vehicle that were truly bulletproof.
Because of this **** I wasn’t very pleased with the Capone wagon. I wanted a closed car, lined with steel and with bulletproof windows that worked. I had learned about nonworking windows when the King of England came within a hairsbreadth of passing out from the heat during his 1939 visit. But you couldn’t get any autos that could repel an air rifle pellet for $750. I explained that to some friends in Detroit, and an automobile company (Ford) was nice enough to build an armored job for us. Then Mr. Government pointed out that we couldn’t accept gifts. It was finally arranged to the satisfaction of one and all when the auto people rented us the vehicle for a little under ten dollars a week. “
**** Why did Reilly say these fabled things? My guess is either he may have gotten his facts wrong or as with Oscar Fraley and Eliot Ness, it may have been in the best interest of the book he was having published to throw in the Al Capone connection and embellish the story so to speak. Google “Al Capone” in the news section of Google and you will see the name of Al Capone thrown in with every conceivable news story out there! The name Capone really helps get your attention.
The major problems with the story are the following;
1) As erroneously reported by many authors and news outlets, the alleged Capone Cadillac in the story doesn’t match the Presidential Cadillac car taken in a photo on December 8,1941, enroute to Congress. For that matter, none of Capone’s known two 1931 Cadillacs match the Presidential Cadillac leaving the White House December 8,1941 or any photos shown of FDR motorcade after that date. The Capone car being used by FDR on the day of his famous speech (December 8th, 1941) was a rumor started by later authors who got the Michael Reilly story wrong. This has been perpetuated over the years right up until today.
Car on the right with flags is FDR’s Cadillac leaving the White house for ‘Day of Infamy’ speech at Congress on December 8,1941. This photo disproves many books, news media outlets and websites perpetuating the myth that Capone’s 1928 V8 armoured Cadillac was used to transport the President to his famous “Day of Infamy” speech. This car used by the President is a much later dated car fitting that era of the late 30’s to early 40’s.
This was not Al Capone’s armored Cadillac. (1941 ACME photo).
For comparison. Left to right; FDR’s car used before and after infamy speech, Al Capone’s supposed 1928 V8 Cadillac at the Niagara Fall Auto museum and a another supposed Capone rebuilt 1931 V16 armoured Cadillac verified by Capone friend and cell mate Morris “Red” Rudensky. Rudensky was notorious at stretching the truth.
2) So even if anyone is trying to say that the late model shown in the first picture was Al’s car then one would have to explain the following;
In 1939, Capone had just left prison and had the mind of a 13 year old, so the angle that the Cadillac was probably a later model than that of 1928 is unfounded. Al Capone was in prison from 1932 to 1939, was financially strapped and was in no position to purchase any armoured Cadillacs while incarcerated.
4) In 1933, the 1928 Capone Cadillac mentioned for this FDR story was sold and shipped to England and didn’t return until 1958. It went to the new owner who ran an amusement park overseas. After U.S. pressure to stop glorifying gangsters, the owner soon tired of the car and sold the Cadillac to dance hall owner Tony Stuart. If the U.S. Government was pressuring Britain to stop glorifying gangsters with display of the Capone car then why would the U.S. Government condone the President riding in any known gangster car? This would defy any logic. Also, you would think since the President was constantly eyed upon, this by the press and public that someone would have a taken a photo of him in or near any of Al Capone’s autos.
5) Nobody at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library has any photos or documents showing that the 1928 Capone Cadillac supposedly connected to Capone was ever used by FDR. They claim this was made up entirely by Michael Reilly.
Capone’s supposed 1928 Cadillac being loaded up and shipped to England in 1933.
(Photo New York Daily News)
The 1928 Cadillac being demonstrated (with fake thompson and gangsters) to the crowds in
England at a carnival sideshow in the mid to late 1930’s.
January 23, 1958.
This car stayed in England until 1958, Tony Stuart bought it in hopes to immediately resell it to an American. His wish didn’t come true when it was eventually sold and shipped to Harley Neilson of Toronto Canada. So you can now see that this car featured in the news and storybooks never had the chance to drive FDR around Washington at any time.
April 28,1958. Car is bought up by Chocolate magnate Harley Neilson. The 1928 car was then sold to
the Niagara falls museum in the late 60’s.
Al Capone’s alleged 1928 armoured Cadillac on display at Niagara falls museum, Canada.
(Photo courtesy of Mr. Mike Tona)
This is more what FDR was riding in that day. This is an example of a closed 1940 Cadillac.
(copyright 2008 photo courtesy Hyman, Ltd. Auction Company and Yann Saunders’ “Cadillac Database”)
The White House had plenty of cars in wait as the “Sunshine Special” was being retrofitted by Ford. FDR had also during this time at his disposal two 1938 Convertible Cadillacs nicknamed the “Queen Mary” and the “Queen Elizabeth”.
Then why say they used a world reknowned criminal’s wheels?
1) We are totally gullible
2) It makes a good story that sells books and shows.
3) If It comes out of the mouth of a Secret Service man, then you know it must be true.
This is the documentation below that was offered at auction explaining the provenance of this 1928 Capone car.
Thorough documentation begins with the purchase of this car by Mr. Harry LaBreque in May of 1933 from Mr. Patrick Moore, of 37 Grove Street in Rockville, Connecticut. The RM research team was able to locate Mr. Moore’s only surviving descendant, Mrs. Pat Denning, who recently discussed her parent’s brief ownership of the Cadillac. According to Mrs. Denning, her parents purchased the car from an agent in Chicago, with whom they believed it had been placed by Capone. The Moores worked with a traveling carnival in the summer and owned the car for “about a year,” including a full summer, when they exhibited the car with the carnival. This information dates their purchase from the agent to the spring of 1932.
The Moores intended to use the car as a standalone exhibit to make extra money during the winter off-season. The plan did not work as intended; thus, the car was sold to LaBreque. Mrs. Denning also noted that her parents did not have a permanent address during this time; the given address in Rockville was actually her aunt’s address, and in 1930, they were actually in Peoria, Illinois. She further stated that it is unlikely that the car was ever brought to Connecticut and that it would not have been registered, more likely traveling on a trailer covered up to preserve its condition and to exclude viewing until patrons had paid to see it; this is consistent with a statement later made by LaBreque, stating that he purchased the car in Chicago.
Emil Denemark was a prominent owner of a Cadillac dealership on the south side of Chicago, who was also related to Capone by marriage. Denemark was well connected to the underworld; it is documented that his house and business were bombed in early-1927, in what he called a “political attack.” In 1942, he was charged with selling cars without gas ration stickers and, further establishing his long-term good standing with the mob, his name comes up as late as 1950 in a document titled Investigation of Organized Crime in Interstate Commerce, according to the testimony of one of the investigators:
“I asked him where he got his 1950 Cadillac, and he said `Denemark.’ This fellow, Gioe, bought his at Denemark’s. Campagna, for the first time in his life, bought one at Joe Bergl’s instead of Denemark’s, but he always did business with Denemark before…these fellows evidently did business with Denemark when they purchased their cars.”
Among Mr. Denemark’s clients was Alphonse Capone. An article published in The Milwaukee Sentinel on December 22, 1931 headlined that one of Capone’s two V-16s had been used to chauffeur Warden David Moneypenny of the Cook County jail. The headline reads, “Al Capone’s Car Carries Jail Warden” with the skeptical subhead, “Chicago-Springfield Trip Divergently Explained.” In the article, Denemark stated that he sold Capone two V-16s and that the car used to transport Moneypenny no longer belonged to Capone because both had been repossessed for non-payment. Given Denemark’s apparent longstanding good relations with organized crime, and the fact that Capone was one of the most dangerous men in Chicago, it is likely, as the reporter evidently believed, that Denemark was simply trying to save face for Big Al.
The author of an Associated Press story run in The Milwaukee Journal, also on December 22, traced the license plate and found that the car was still registered to Mrs. Mae Capone. In response to a question about this peculiarity, Denemark quite innocently responded, “By accident the license plates had not been removed, so I guess that’s why everybody thought it was still Capone’s car.” Another piece in The Muscatine Journal & News Tribune reads:
“For a time, it looked as though the restrictions the government put on visitors calling to see the gang chief in the county jail would operate to keep his creditors away, but at least one of them got permission from federal authorities to talk to him. He was Emil Denemark, a politician and dealer in high priced motor cars, who said he wanted to speak to Al about the remaining payments due on two expensive automobiles.”
Denemark’s unusual level of access and long involvement with underworld figures suggests that their business involved more than automobile payments.
The timing of these events, as they relate to Capone’s legal issues, is critical. Capone was convicted on October 18, 1931, sentenced in November, and had a rehearing of appeal denied in March of 1932, with his sentence at Atlanta U.S. Penitentiary beginning on May 4, 1932. A lengthy report addressed to the Intelligence Unit Chief of the Bureau of Internal Revenue states that Capone was caught in October 1931 attempting to sell his home in Florida, along with two yachts and other items, for $150,000 cash. One of the sixteens is mentioned among other vehicles; given that these two sixteens had made their way into the headlines and grabbed the attention of the Feds, the older, armored Model 341A sedan was evidently overlooked while it lay quietly tucked away in a Chicago garage. The timing and circumstances strongly suggest that the car was consigned to the agent at the behest of Capone, as Mrs. Denning was led to believe, and that agent was Emil Denemark.
The ownership history after the purchase by LaBreque is well-known and heavily documented. He purchased it for Capt. de Forest Morehouse over in England. After being shipped to New York and shipped to England, it was displayed at the Southend-On-Sea amusement park and later at the Blackpool Fun Fair in Manchester. Dance hall owner Tony Stuart purchased the car for $510 at an auction in February of 1958 and sold it months later to Harley Nielson, a businessman and car enthusiast from Todmorden, Ontario. Neilson undertook a comprehensive restoration, and in the process, most of the heavy armor plating was removed, but other features, including the bulletproof glass and drop-down rear window, were retained. In a Letter to the Editor of Esquire, Neilson explained that in 1939, the U.S. government asked the British government to intervene and take the car off display because of the “poor public relations it could cause by pointing up American Gangsterism.” On April 15th, 1958, a photograph published in the Toronto Globe and Mail shows the Capone Cadillac being prepared for shipment to Canada after its purchase by Harley Neilson, a Toronto-area businessman and car enthusiast. Although solid and virtually complete, the car had not run in years, so Neilson undertook a comprehensive restoration. Most of the heavy armor plating was removed, but other features, including the bulletproof glass and drop-down rear window, were retained.
Neilson retained the car for several years before selling it to the Niagara Falls Antique Auto Museum in the mid-1960s, where it remained until November 20th, 1971, when the museum was liquidated by public auction with nearly 50 cars sold. Among them was the Capone Cadillac, which drew $37,000.
Postcard of Capone’s fabled 1928 Cadillac at the Antique Auto Museum Niagara falls Canada circa late1960’s.
(Mario Gomes Collection)
The buyer, as confirmed by a 1973 Ontario registration, was Peter Stranges of Niagara Falls, Canada, who co-owned the Cars of the Greats museum. In February 1975, they offered the car at auction in Atlantic City, New Jersey, reportedly turning down $81,000 and insisting they wanted closer to $100,000 before selling. Stranges then arranged to have the car shipped to Chicago for the launch of the movie Capone on April 14th, 1975, where it generated national publicity. Finally, on January 13th, 1979, the “Cars of the Greats” collection was sold and B.H. Atchley, owner of Tennessee’s Smoky Mountain Car Museum, purchased the Cadillac.
Atchley freshened the restoration, and since the original glass was heavily crazed and deeply yellowed, a specialist supplied replacement glass of identical size and thickness. In early 2006, the Cadillac was again sold and joined the collection of the late Mr. John O’Quinn.
Two of Al Capone’s real owned Cadillacs were purchase at Emil Denemark’s Cadillac dealership at 3860 Ogden. Denemark had alleged shady dealings with the Capone gang. One for his wife, Capone didn’t get a chance to enjoy his very long, in fact, he probably never set foot in one since he was hauled off to prison before the delivery. None of these cars were bullet proofed. (Mario Gomes Collection)
The Real Capone Cars
For Al Capone owning a bonafide armored automobile, I personally would lean more toward late 1924 to early 1925. In his 1931 tax trial, an auto dealer once questioned about Al’s auto purchases responded that Al Capone in 1924, wanted a car “specially built“.
An auto built just like one of his friends had?
So with that said, the price spent as mentioned in the trial for this specially built auto was over $12,500? Now the highest priced model for a regular 7 passenger McFarlan according the 1924 price list at that time was just about under $7,000? Now what kind of accessory could cost an extra $5,000?
Let’s say that if Capone knew O’Banion was going to be hit, he then would have foreseen the writing on the wall that the Northsiders would come at him with everything they had as far as firepower.
Sylvester Barton, an Al Capone chauffeur, got hit by the Northsiders in early 1925, because he was not in an armored auto and because it turned out the auto was actually Ralph Capone’s and not Al’s.
In 1925, Al supposedly had steel shutters installed on the Hawthorne Hotel windows. It was also reported at this time about the armored Al Capone had adopted and that Torrio had also fortified his jail cell windows in Waukegan.
In 1926, when after Hymie Weiss (1926) and Vincent Drucci (1927) were killed, Capone let go of the armored autos in favor of heavy bodyguard details. By 1928, Al Capone was rarely seen in Chicago, this since buying his Miami home.
When he came back to Chicago for the special occaision of his pal Tony Lombardo’s funeral, It was reported that Capone arrived at the cemetary in a bullet proof automobile loaned out to him. On later occaisions when coming to Chicago, he was simply insulated by the same entourage or in heavy police presence. At any rate, the remenants of the Northsiders could never get access to the big fellow, even if they wanted to.
So is this 1928 auto the real Capone Cadillac? The honest answer would be that there is no absolute proof of it tied to Al Capone at all. The only cars tied to Capone were mentioned during his trial by witnesses who testified selling him cars for money. The 1928 Caddy was not one of these.The web page you are currently viewing was intended solely to distance Franklin D. Roosevelt from riding in anything that may or may not have belonged to Capone. Why may or may not belonged? Simply because there is no absolute concrete proof this 1928 Caddy or the black 1931 Caddy that owned by the late Sidney Craig ever belonged to Al Capone! Even with the shady Morris “Red” Rudensky claim. Rudensky like to stretch the truth for his own benefit. To be sure we can only go by fact!
Capone through court records and his tax trial owned; McFarlan automobiles, Lincoln automobiles, Packards.
and a couple of Cadillacs that he never got to use and that was repossessed by Emil Denemark.
Did he have an armored vehicle? Possibly, but the details for that are very sketchy. If he ever did, It had to be way before 1929. Why you ask? Because after 1929, it was illegal in some states for any private citizen to own an armored vehicle.
To this very day supposed Capone’s owned guns and cars have become the stuff of legends!!
March 1931.The big fellow getting into the back of his non armored 1930 Lincoln.
Although Capone had amassed a certain amount of wealth during his reign as gang czar of Chicago, his personal net worth may have been exaggerated somewhat. The huge amounts of money made by “The Outfit” belonged and was spread amongst “The Outfit”. Capone’s share as CEO was a very sizeable one. Problem was Capone spent it as fast as in came in. Thinking the flow would last forever, Capone was spending lavishly. He was a very bad gambler and spender, buying booze, food, funding many parties, women, hunting trips, personal trips while doting on his son, wife and family. Capone mostly bought big ticket items under his wife’s or mother’s name ( Two houses and a couple of cars). He did buy some things outright to his name that were brought up in his trial. Things like jewelry, furniture and renovations to his Miami home. For the cars, only 4 are bonafidely linked to Capone through court financial statements and witnesses. Two McFarlans (a 1924 and a 1926), one of which was traded in for the other. Both McFarlan automobiles were purchased at G. C. Auto, which later became McFarlan Motor Co. situated at 1217 Morse avenue. Mr. C. Buxton testified at Capone’s tax trial as having sold the two cars to Capone. Capone doled out the down payment cash and the licenses were all in Mae Capone’s name. On May 18,1928, he purchased a 7 passenger Lincoln sedan from S&L Motor Co. He plucked down $5,380 for it. He purchased another in 1929, and one more in 1930. None of these were bullet proofed or armored. 1931 arrived and signaled the downfall of Capone through his tax trial and he was no longer in the buying mood. The Treasury men where raiding his booze operations and what was left of his money was being eaten up by his lawyers for his income tax trial.
Capone’s other car was a V16 Cadillac that was seized by authorities. It was registered under Mae Capone’s name and documents showed that payments were still owed to Emil Denemark Cadillac.That Cadillac had made the news when on December 14,1931, Cook County Warden David Moneypenny had unknowingly used the car for a trip to Springfield as a witness for a parole board hearing. This car was then used from 1932 to 1936 at various film promotions such as Scarface, and other gangster movies. Many of these snake oil showmen ripped off the pubilc by taking automobiles and modifying them to say they belonged to Al Capone. It got so bad that it was virtually impossible to say what was real or not.
Capone’s 1930 16 cylinder Cadillac at movie theatres in the 1930’s.
One of the fake Capone cars unmasked.
Columbus Telegram May 23,1934.
Many rumors of Capone owning houses and cars all over the U.S. and Canada. None are founded on proof. The fact was Al Capone, during his incarceration, had a hard time keeping up the payments on the Miami home and the few cars he owned. Most were reposessed and after Al’s death. Mae had to sell the remaining cars and eventually the Palm Island estate itself.
1928, Sonny and Al Capone in Florida standing next to the Capone family Packard. Most were owned
by Mae or other family members.
(Mario Gomes Collection)
THE PERCEPTED IMAGINARY VIEW
The imaginary is that one could see Al Capone in a Chicago street with his bodyguard openly holding a
Thompson submachine gun for his protection. This is utter and complete nonsense! They would have
both been arrested on the spot.
According to some viewers of the Jay Leno’s Garage series, there recently was an episode when Jay visited the Secret Service department. There according to Special Agent John Ryan Leno was informed that it was actually a 1939 Packard and not a 1928 Cadillac that was seized from Al Capone. According to the agent once the vehicle was impounded, the government officials had observed that the windows were bullet proof (not the body). That’s when the car was used by President of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt forprotection.
Well that’s all nice for the cameras, but the story still doesn’t hold much water. We need specifics for which they do not divulge.
The known facts are;
1) Al Capone was in prison from 1932-1939. He left prison inNovember 1939.
2) He couldn’t have bought any bullet proofed glassed car or any other cars for that matter while incarcerated (1932-1939).
3) By the time he left prison he was reduced to acting like a 12 year old child. He was very sick and hardly made it back home to Miami by car in 1940. How could he make a bullet proof car purchase?
4) The Capone’s owned their house in Miami and in Chicago which would have been better for seizure for back taxes if the Government was seizing anything of value at that time, but they never seized those. Why? They couldn’t seize any of them because none of the homes were under Al Capone’s ownership. I do not believe that a mentally unstable Al Capone left prison then visited a car dealership and bought a Packard convertible to which he signed his name as ownership, not only that but then having it customized to have bullet proof windows installed?? There are also no accounts of the Government seizing an Al Capone car in 1939.
5)In November 1939, Al Capone made it to from prison to train station and then to the Baltimore hospital with government agents in their own vehicle.
Al Capone in a Government car (Hardtop) leaving the train station at Harrisburg, PA in 1939.
6) Even if the account is to be believed that a supposed Capone 1939 convertible Packard was driving around the President in 1941, then why is photo of the car driving the President to Congress for his infamy speech not match the account of the Secret Service agent (Cadillac or Packard convertible)?
Car to the right bringing Franklin Roosevelt to Congress in 1941. It’s a hardtop Cadillac, not a Packard.
My take is the info may be erroneous. If there is any truth to the Secret Service story, it is that a convertible car that was once used to transport Capone by the Government may have been also used by the President, but not a 1939 Packard personally owned by Alphonse Capone. Even that to me is far fetched because the cars I have seen Capone transported in by law officials were all hardtops and not like the photo that was shown on Jay Leno’s Garage show. Again, the burden of proof lies strictly with the Secret Service in providing photos and info on said Capone bulletproof Cadillac used by FDR.
For this particular web page my special thanks go out to Cadillac expert Mr. Yann Saunders at the Cadillac Database, crime author Allan May, Truth or Fiction’s Tony Ashlin and The History Insider blogger Ray Grasshoff. All of whom piqued my curiosity to create this webpage. http://www.myalcaponemuseum.com/id196.htm
(First posted August 2014)
Brad Meltzer’s LostHistory:
As the newspaper publisher said in the movie The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance :
“This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”VIEW MOVIE HERE: FDR Hitched a Ride in Al Capone’s Car
The term “Dog Days” traditionally refers to a period of particularly hot and humid weather occurring during the summer months of July and August in the Northern Hemisphere. In ancient Greece and Rome, the Dog Days were believed to be a time of drought, bad luck, and unrest, when dogs and men alike would be driven mad by the extreme heat.
Banging your head against a wall for one hour burns 150 calories.
In Switzerland it is illegal to own just one guinea pig.
Pteronophobia is the fear of being tickled by feathers.
Snakes can help predict earthquakes.
A flock of crows is known as a murder.